The ‘authentic magisterium’ indicates the magisterium made a mistake in 1949

If the SSPX accepts Archbishop Muller’s version of Vatican Council II it would be a sin. They would be saying that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II are a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

The ‘authentic magisterium’ is presently using the false premise of being able to physically see people saved who are now in Heaven.
It is with this premise that it interprets the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II.

Since the dead are visible on earth, Archbishop Muller interprets Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance) as a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Tradition.

This is the ‘authentic magisterium’ saying the Letter of the Holy Office was critical of Fr. Leonard Feeney, since he did not consider invincible ignorance as an exception to his traditional interpretation of the dogma on salvation. The magisterium today is saying that these cases are physically visible to us to be exceptions to Fr. Leonard Feeney. This is the dead man walking premise.

This is also heresy. It is the rejection of a dogma which Pope Pius XII called an ‘infallible teaching’.

It is this heresy, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, which Archbishop Muller wants the SSPX to accept this month with the promise of canonical status.

The SSPX could ask the ‘authentic magisterium’ to first affirm Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 without the dead man walking premise and then could resume dialogue.-Lionel Andrades

Lionel,

This is a duplicate thread to the one above. Once again, please get the exact text of Archbishop Muller's words. And, remember, it was just an interview. Perhaps he just spoke poorly?