There is a new Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
There is a new Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum
THERE IS A NEW EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS FORUM: IT DOES NOT CONSIDER THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE AS BEING VISIBLE AND SO AN EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA ON SALVATION
There is a new Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum which does not consider invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire as being exceptions to the dogma on salvation.
It accepts the possibility of a person being saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire.However since these cases are not known to us in 2013 they cannot be exceptions to the everyone needing to be a visible member of the Catholic Church.Invisible cases are not exceptions.
The new forum does not have the understanding of extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the liberals and the Society of St.Pius X priests, Father Francois Laisney and Joseph Pfeiffer (SSPX-SO). For them the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are physically visible exceptions to the thrice defined dogma.
The new forum admin is an orthodox, traditional Catholic, fluent in informatics.He has the ability to see clearly and express himself well on this subject.He was formerly writing under the name Jehanne on an Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum which considered the baptism of desire as visible and so an exception to every one needing to be a visible member of the Church for salvation. This is contrary to the thrice defined dogma,Vatican Council II (AG 7) and other Magisterial texts (CCC 846,Dominus Iesus 20, Letter of the Holy Office 1949 etc.
-Lionel Andrades
There is a new Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum which does not consider invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire as being exceptions to the dogma on salvation.
It accepts the possibility of a person being saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire.However since these cases are not known to us in 2013 they cannot be exceptions to the everyone needing to be a visible member of the Catholic Church.Invisible cases are not exceptions.
The new forum does not have the understanding of extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the liberals and the Society of St.Pius X priests, Father Francois Laisney and Joseph Pfeiffer (SSPX-SO). For them the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are physically visible exceptions to the thrice defined dogma.
The new forum admin is an orthodox, traditional Catholic, fluent in informatics.He has the ability to see clearly and express himself well on this subject.He was formerly writing under the name Jehanne on an Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum which considered the baptism of desire as visible and so an exception to every one needing to be a visible member of the Church for salvation. This is contrary to the thrice defined dogma,Vatican Council II (AG 7) and other Magisterial texts (CCC 846,Dominus Iesus 20, Letter of the Holy Office 1949 etc.
-Lionel Andrades
Lionel A- Posts : 253
Join date : 2013-02-14
Re: There is a new Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus Forum
Thanks, Lionel, yes, I agree. If there are "visible exceptions" to visible membership in the Catholic Church, who, exactly, are these people? Can anyone provide any names? And, why has the Catholic Church not canonized any of these folks? Consider this list of Saints:
http://www.catholic.org/saints/stindex.php
Just for the letter 'A', there are 894 individuals, all of whom were "card-carrying" Catholics, the vast majority of whom were sacramentally baptized and all of whom had formal submission to the Roman Pontiff, Vicar of God.
http://www.catholic.org/saints/stindex.php
Just for the letter 'A', there are 894 individuals, all of whom were "card-carrying" Catholics, the vast majority of whom were sacramentally baptized and all of whom had formal submission to the Roman Pontiff, Vicar of God.
Similar topics
» Second Vatican Council II does not agree with Tradition for Archbishop Gerhard Muller
» Robert Sungenis
» Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre is in agreement with Fr.Leonard Feeney ?
» Bro.Thomas Augustine will still not answer if the baptism of desire cases are physically visible to us
» Catechism of the Catholic Church and Mortal Sin with reference to extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Vatican Council II etc.
» Robert Sungenis
» Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre is in agreement with Fr.Leonard Feeney ?
» Bro.Thomas Augustine will still not answer if the baptism of desire cases are physically visible to us
» Catechism of the Catholic Church and Mortal Sin with reference to extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Vatican Council II etc.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|