Baptism of Desire cannot possibly be visible.
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Baptism of Desire cannot possibly be visible.
The Council of Trent declares this:
Of course, the Second Vatican Council reaffirmed the decrees of the Council of Trent in Lumen Gentium, 51.
If we cannot say with "absolute and infallible certainty" that we will go to Heaven, how could we possibly make such a claim about any non-Catholic, whether such an individual has been publicly baptized or not??? Clearly, BoD is not visible!CANON XVI -- If any one saith, that he will for certain, of an absolute and infallible certainty, have that great gift of perseverance unto the end, unless he have learned this by special revelation; let him be anathema.
Of course, the Second Vatican Council reaffirmed the decrees of the Council of Trent in Lumen Gentium, 51.
Letter of the Holy Office and visible baptism of desire
So if the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 implied that the baptism of desire was visible it would be an error ?
Lionel A- Posts : 253
Join date : 2013-02-14
Re: Baptism of Desire cannot possibly be visible.
Yes, if the Holy Office letter did, in fact, imply that, but clearly, as the Holy Office cited the Council of Trent, then it could not be implying that BoD was visible, for it would have contradicted Trent, and hence, itself for having cited Trent as an authority!
So this was Mons.Fenton's interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 with allegedly known exceptions. Visible to him!
Agreed!
The Letter mentions the dogma and refers to 'the infalllible teaching'.
So this was Mons.Fenton's interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 with allegedly known exceptions. Visible to him!
The Letter mentions the dogma and refers to 'the infalllible teaching'.
So this was Mons.Fenton's interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 with allegedly known exceptions. Visible to him!
Lionel A- Posts : 253
Join date : 2013-02-14
Re: Baptism of Desire cannot possibly be visible.
Well, "call him out" (if he is still alive, probably not), and unless he can name some of these "visible exceptions," then he ought to retract his statement.
He never made the invisible-visible, explicit-implicit distinction.
He is dead but his writings are important for traditionalists. He never made the invisible-visible, explicit-implicit distinction.
Lionel A- Posts : 253
Join date : 2013-02-14
Similar topics
» So many reports on the Internet assume that the baptism of desire is visible- 3
» Bro.Thomas Augustine will still not answer if the baptism of desire cases are physically visible to us
» The Fifth Lateran Council
» So many reports on the Internet assume that the baptism of desire is visible to us and so is an exception to Fr.Leonard Feeney
» Fish eaters Traditonal Catholic Forum assumes there is a visible baptism of desire
» Bro.Thomas Augustine will still not answer if the baptism of desire cases are physically visible to us
» The Fifth Lateran Council
» So many reports on the Internet assume that the baptism of desire is visible to us and so is an exception to Fr.Leonard Feeney
» Fish eaters Traditonal Catholic Forum assumes there is a visible baptism of desire
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum